<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why you should attend BlogCampPune &#8211; 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/</link>
	<description>Information about software, engineering, IT, technology, companies, institutes in Pune, India</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:02:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogs, Blog Camps, and a Thousand Words &#171; A Fine Imbalance</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs, Blog Camps, and a Thousand Words &#171; A Fine Imbalance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>[...] 2, 2009   [This is in continuation of a discussion that started on PuneTech, on Navin&#039;s Blog about BlogCamp Pune 2. Although I wasn&#039;t planning to attend the blog camp, I got sucked into the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2, 2009   [This is in continuation of a discussion that started on PuneTech, on Navin's Blog about BlogCamp Pune 2. Although I wasn't planning to attend the blog camp, I got sucked into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pune Blog Camp 2: Reflections &#171; An Unquiet Mind</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-7025</link>
		<dc:creator>Pune Blog Camp 2: Reflections &#171; An Unquiet Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-7025</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion going on even before the blog camp in the comments to Navin Kabra’s PuneTech Why You Should Attend Pune Blog Camp post. At the other end of the spectrum, post-event, the insights from the camp led to Dhananjay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion going on even before the blog camp in the comments to Navin Kabra’s PuneTech Why You Should Attend Pune Blog Camp post. At the other end of the spectrum, post-event, the insights from the camp led to Dhananjay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I was disappointed with Pune Blogcamp 2 &#124; /home/dhananjay</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6990</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I was disappointed with Pune Blogcamp 2 &#124; /home/dhananjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6990</guid>
		<description>[...] of that diversity actually already showed itself up in a thread prior to the blogcamp on the post Why you should attend BlogCampPune &#8211; 2. Some bloggers were already less than keen to attend a blogcamp. In general, I have gathered that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of that diversity actually already showed itself up in a thread prior to the blogcamp on the post Why you should attend BlogCampPune &#8211; 2. Some bloggers were already less than keen to attend a blogcamp. In general, I have gathered that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falcon</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6987</link>
		<dc:creator>Falcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6987</guid>
		<description>@ Sandeep Gautam

thx for the info. I did not say all I said &lt;B&gt;&quot;MOST&quot;&lt;/B&gt; and not all Blog abt &quot;Science&quot;...What I said was what I tht was the general Opinion.. Now what if I had posted my entire comment on my blog and just pasted a link here...
My words were tempting enough to provoke a reaction from you, may be it could have been tempting enough for someone to believe it.
And that&#039;s where the folly lies... My statements can and cannot be true. let&#039;s for a moment agree it is true. Now even though it may be a true statement it lacks credibility .. the very word &quot;most&quot; makes it lose credibility. And that&#039;s why I said it is difficult to use them as references while they are good to gain an overall knowledge.

In fact even for the science stuff i have access to better sources like Ebscohost... (paid service) so I choose the safer way out for my references.
The freedom of unchecked publishing has its cons too, there is no one to verify &quot;ALL&quot; the statements published, the same is true for websites and that&#039;s what I pointed out!
I seriously believe that a day will come when One can use blog as a reference just as one would use an encyclopedia.. A day where there would be no issues of content lifting and no fear of Plagiarism... but for that day to come we all have to be a much more responsible bloggers. 

We have come far away from &quot;Dear Diaries day&quot; even though there was nothing wrong in it.. kind of diversified but then blogging has to cover a lot more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sandeep Gautam</p>
<p>thx for the info. I did not say all I said <b>&#8220;MOST&#8221;</b> and not all Blog abt &#8220;Science&#8221;&#8230;What I said was what I tht was the general Opinion.. Now what if I had posted my entire comment on my blog and just pasted a link here&#8230;<br />
My words were tempting enough to provoke a reaction from you, may be it could have been tempting enough for someone to believe it.<br />
And that&#8217;s where the folly lies&#8230; My statements can and cannot be true. let&#8217;s for a moment agree it is true. Now even though it may be a true statement it lacks credibility .. the very word &#8220;most&#8221; makes it lose credibility. And that&#8217;s why I said it is difficult to use them as references while they are good to gain an overall knowledge.</p>
<p>In fact even for the science stuff i have access to better sources like Ebscohost&#8230; (paid service) so I choose the safer way out for my references.<br />
The freedom of unchecked publishing has its cons too, there is no one to verify &#8220;ALL&#8221; the statements published, the same is true for websites and that&#8217;s what I pointed out!<br />
I seriously believe that a day will come when One can use blog as a reference just as one would use an encyclopedia.. A day where there would be no issues of content lifting and no fear of Plagiarism&#8230; but for that day to come we all have to be a much more responsible bloggers. </p>
<p>We have come far away from &#8220;Dear Diaries day&#8221; even though there was nothing wrong in it.. kind of diversified but then blogging has to cover a lot more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhinav S</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6986</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhinav S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6986</guid>
		<description>Now that the Blogcamp is over I would like to go back to the question that @Dhananjay asked somewhere in between. 
Using the same nomenclature, I would think “yes” factors (b) and (c) i.e. promotion and Value focus (to use the same triad) are the defining differentiation between topical and dear diary/non-topical blogs.
If some non-topical blogs/diary blogs don’t share the same readership it is sometimes out of the skepticism that in pursuit of “value focus” they might loose their Mojo.
Increased readership or making it interesting sometimes ends up in endorsing someone or something which you didn’t begin to do with your blog, and at that point your blog stops being a blog.
@asuph had one view about Blogcamp to let ‘such’ bloggers have a party of their own and @Dhananjay raised the point that why don’t bloggers of all feather flock together and that was the premise of my initial argument. 
Who dictates the terms of BlogCamp and how can you decide who is a real blogger? Or blogcamp should have ‘interesting’ bloggers only? To which @navin explained his stand well enough and that was fine.
But then at the end of BlogCamp Pune 2 I have a question lingering in my mind, how many such non-topic bloggers attended the Camp and how much they contributed to it (off course I could have made it up there myself to take up the cause but unfortunately I couldn’t make it) and if the number was negligible then is @asuph’s idea better to have a separate format of blogcamp for such bloggers? Or try to work on @Dhananjay’s advice to get all bloggers (topic specific, non-topic, dear diary, etc. etc.) under one roof and if it needs some tweaks in the current BlogCamp format, then be it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the Blogcamp is over I would like to go back to the question that @Dhananjay asked somewhere in between.<br />
Using the same nomenclature, I would think “yes” factors (b) and (c) i.e. promotion and Value focus (to use the same triad) are the defining differentiation between topical and dear diary/non-topical blogs.<br />
If some non-topical blogs/diary blogs don’t share the same readership it is sometimes out of the skepticism that in pursuit of “value focus” they might loose their Mojo.<br />
Increased readership or making it interesting sometimes ends up in endorsing someone or something which you didn’t begin to do with your blog, and at that point your blog stops being a blog.<br />
@asuph had one view about Blogcamp to let ‘such’ bloggers have a party of their own and @Dhananjay raised the point that why don’t bloggers of all feather flock together and that was the premise of my initial argument.<br />
Who dictates the terms of BlogCamp and how can you decide who is a real blogger? Or blogcamp should have ‘interesting’ bloggers only? To which @navin explained his stand well enough and that was fine.<br />
But then at the end of BlogCamp Pune 2 I have a question lingering in my mind, how many such non-topic bloggers attended the Camp and how much they contributed to it (off course I could have made it up there myself to take up the cause but unfortunately I couldn’t make it) and if the number was negligible then is @asuph’s idea better to have a separate format of blogcamp for such bloggers? Or try to work on @Dhananjay’s advice to get all bloggers (topic specific, non-topic, dear diary, etc. etc.) under one roof and if it needs some tweaks in the current BlogCamp format, then be it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asuph</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6984</link>
		<dc:creator>asuph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6984</guid>
		<description>Hi Sandeep,

Glad to see your response. Agree with you. 

I thought blogs as being more than dear diary is hard for *anyone* to deny anymore. My point all through is just this: sticking with *whatever* idea of blogging a blogger has, for himself/herself, is okay (so far as he/she that&#039;s what blogging is all about). We don&#039;t need to grow one at the expense of the other. 

Or, that it&#039;s not necessarily nostalgia. I&#039;m not denying there is an element of nostalgia for some. But for others it might be a much more than that. The &#039;lack of focus&#039; could be intentional, or a matter of choice. A niche, non-growing, audience, might be fulfilling someone&#039;s requirements from blogging. It might be a way of life chosen, and not necessarily by default. And it&#039;s fundamentally okay.

I don&#039;t think such bloggers are looking down on bloggers who write topical blogs, say, or deep technical blogs, or blogs that are optimized for traffic and/or monetary considerations (but then again, some might be, unfortunately). However, the feeling has to be reciprocated, as a matter of philosophy (I might believe my religion is the greatest, but I should give allowance to other religions, right?). I didn&#039;t feel that was happening here, till navin&#039;s clarification and now yours. 

I think this plethora of possibilities in both spectra that we have in blogging (including podcasts/photo-blogs/and-so-on) does put us in a unique position vis-a-vis mass, mainstream media. I&#039;m all for mutual respect :).

You know what: all these 20 odd comments could have been avoided (of course, what fun would it be, then?) with one reason added to the list: &quot;and if none of this interests you, there might be bloggers like you, who blog on whim, and you might just be able to connect with&quot;. But then, one might argue that that is given in a blog-camp, and Navin was trying just go beyond that. Just looking at the article, it wouldn&#039;t have occurred to me (although now, I do see it that way, even though much was lost in expression). 

For me, the most important strength of the blogging medium is this: we can have dissent, and discuss, and if it&#039;s a particularly good day, we might even all agree.

Amen to that :)
asuph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sandeep,</p>
<p>Glad to see your response. Agree with you. </p>
<p>I thought blogs as being more than dear diary is hard for *anyone* to deny anymore. My point all through is just this: sticking with *whatever* idea of blogging a blogger has, for himself/herself, is okay (so far as he/she that&#8217;s what blogging is all about). We don&#8217;t need to grow one at the expense of the other. </p>
<p>Or, that it&#8217;s not necessarily nostalgia. I&#8217;m not denying there is an element of nostalgia for some. But for others it might be a much more than that. The &#8216;lack of focus&#8217; could be intentional, or a matter of choice. A niche, non-growing, audience, might be fulfilling someone&#8217;s requirements from blogging. It might be a way of life chosen, and not necessarily by default. And it&#8217;s fundamentally okay.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think such bloggers are looking down on bloggers who write topical blogs, say, or deep technical blogs, or blogs that are optimized for traffic and/or monetary considerations (but then again, some might be, unfortunately). However, the feeling has to be reciprocated, as a matter of philosophy (I might believe my religion is the greatest, but I should give allowance to other religions, right?). I didn&#8217;t feel that was happening here, till navin&#8217;s clarification and now yours. </p>
<p>I think this plethora of possibilities in both spectra that we have in blogging (including podcasts/photo-blogs/and-so-on) does put us in a unique position vis-a-vis mass, mainstream media. I&#8217;m all for mutual respect :).</p>
<p>You know what: all these 20 odd comments could have been avoided (of course, what fun would it be, then?) with one reason added to the list: &#8220;and if none of this interests you, there might be bloggers like you, who blog on whim, and you might just be able to connect with&#8221;. But then, one might argue that that is given in a blog-camp, and Navin was trying just go beyond that. Just looking at the article, it wouldn&#8217;t have occurred to me (although now, I do see it that way, even though much was lost in expression). </p>
<p>For me, the most important strength of the blogging medium is this: we can have dissent, and discuss, and if it&#8217;s a particularly good day, we might even all agree.</p>
<p>Amen to that :)<br />
asuph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Gautam</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Gautam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>@asuph by &#039;deny&#039; I meant more of &#039;hold on there is more to it than ...&quot;. I see Navin&#039;s initial post as an effort in that direction, trying to highlight that there is more to blogging than just personal opinion/diary. 
I somehow felt that taking to arms against that position was preferring nostalgia/ stereotype of &#039;dear diary&#039; over the diverse reality of present-day blogging. I can now see that the concern was more over equating the many interesting personal blogs and bloggers with the negative stereotype of banality/boringness. I must admit that perhaps I too went overboard and made a strong and perhaps unwanted comment that the negative stereotype (untrustworthiness/ insignificance) is primarily due to personal dear dairy bloggers of the past- I admit that the stereotypes need not have a basis in reality- and if they do indeed have a basis in reality perhaps all types of blogs and bloggers- topical or otherwise need to share the blame. 
Its heartening to note that we all agree that blogs are much more than dear diaries and personal opinions, and perhaps for a few misplaced wordings, that was what Navin had tried to say and I had tried to defend. 
Let peace prevail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@asuph by &#8216;deny&#8217; I meant more of &#8216;hold on there is more to it than &#8230;&#8221;. I see Navin&#8217;s initial post as an effort in that direction, trying to highlight that there is more to blogging than just personal opinion/diary.<br />
I somehow felt that taking to arms against that position was preferring nostalgia/ stereotype of &#8216;dear diary&#8217; over the diverse reality of present-day blogging. I can now see that the concern was more over equating the many interesting personal blogs and bloggers with the negative stereotype of banality/boringness. I must admit that perhaps I too went overboard and made a strong and perhaps unwanted comment that the negative stereotype (untrustworthiness/ insignificance) is primarily due to personal dear dairy bloggers of the past- I admit that the stereotypes need not have a basis in reality- and if they do indeed have a basis in reality perhaps all types of blogs and bloggers- topical or otherwise need to share the blame.<br />
Its heartening to note that we all agree that blogs are much more than dear diaries and personal opinions, and perhaps for a few misplaced wordings, that was what Navin had tried to say and I had tried to defend.<br />
Let peace prevail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asuph</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6977</link>
		<dc:creator>asuph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6977</guid>
		<description>Sandeep:


Can you substantiate your (bogey, IMHO) claim that &quot;some would like to deny a blog any more importance than a personal diary/opinion&quot;. Or are we supposed to take it as a given? On this thread? Anyone?

Because, if that&#039;s what we&#039;re arguing for/against, I&#039;m really on your side. 

Does &#039;deny&#039; mean being unconcerned/unimpressed, or does it actually means: deny, as is meant in an English dictionary? Or does deny means saying that &quot;hold on. there is more to it than ...&quot;. 

regards,
asuph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandeep:</p>
<p>Can you substantiate your (bogey, IMHO) claim that &#8220;some would like to deny a blog any more importance than a personal diary/opinion&#8221;. Or are we supposed to take it as a given? On this thread? Anyone?</p>
<p>Because, if that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re arguing for/against, I&#8217;m really on your side. </p>
<p>Does &#8216;deny&#8217; mean being unconcerned/unimpressed, or does it actually means: deny, as is meant in an English dictionary? Or does deny means saying that &#8220;hold on. there is more to it than &#8230;&#8221;. </p>
<p>regards,<br />
asuph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Gautam</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6972</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Gautam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6972</guid>
		<description>@falcon  The references , to improve blog post credibility, at least in the case of science blogs is to journal articles published in traditional journals- see researchblogging.org - a tool developed by science blogging community itself, when a need for content verification was felt. Apart from that, many times bloggers refer to Main stream Media and of course other bloggers as references- and I see both as sufficiently credible sources of information and not just as personal opinions. 
Regarding why not write a research paper in a traditional journal, remember Impact Factor is not everything that drives publishing decisions of scientists. Some have deliberately chosen to publish exclusively in open-access journals, even though it may have a low IF, as they have a strong commitment to that philosophy, some choose to use blogs as their platform even though they have no IF associated with them for now. And just FYI, there is an emerging trend in which blog posts are being cited in scholarly traditional journal articles and research papers as credible sources of information/ideas and tools are being developed for the same.
I can go on and on about how blogs are being innovatively used but perhaps as I mentioned earlier some would like to deny a blog any more importance than a personal diary/opinion. Always remember that you need not pull down something to establish your case-  one need not denigrate personal bloggers to claim that topical blogging is good/ the future/ the next big thing.  I think the whole confusion of this thread stems from the fact that one is not able to differentiate the dislike for a false stereotype and takes that as a dislike/disrespect for a whole slew of personal bloggers. As a matter of fact, if I dislike the stereotype associated with say Blacks as being violent, I am perhaps more sensitive to the fact that Blacks are not violent and perhaps view Blacks in a positive light. If however, as a Black I take pride in the stereotype that I am violent and seek my identity in that stereotype which has been trust on me by outsiders, perhaps I will only make that stereotype true. One can take pride in the fact that blogs are not considered trustworthy/significant or one can work actively, and try to overcome that stereotype. The choice as always is personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@falcon  The references , to improve blog post credibility, at least in the case of science blogs is to journal articles published in traditional journals- see researchblogging.org &#8211; a tool developed by science blogging community itself, when a need for content verification was felt. Apart from that, many times bloggers refer to Main stream Media and of course other bloggers as references- and I see both as sufficiently credible sources of information and not just as personal opinions.<br />
Regarding why not write a research paper in a traditional journal, remember Impact Factor is not everything that drives publishing decisions of scientists. Some have deliberately chosen to publish exclusively in open-access journals, even though it may have a low IF, as they have a strong commitment to that philosophy, some choose to use blogs as their platform even though they have no IF associated with them for now. And just FYI, there is an emerging trend in which blog posts are being cited in scholarly traditional journal articles and research papers as credible sources of information/ideas and tools are being developed for the same.<br />
I can go on and on about how blogs are being innovatively used but perhaps as I mentioned earlier some would like to deny a blog any more importance than a personal diary/opinion. Always remember that you need not pull down something to establish your case-  one need not denigrate personal bloggers to claim that topical blogging is good/ the future/ the next big thing.  I think the whole confusion of this thread stems from the fact that one is not able to differentiate the dislike for a false stereotype and takes that as a dislike/disrespect for a whole slew of personal bloggers. As a matter of fact, if I dislike the stereotype associated with say Blacks as being violent, I am perhaps more sensitive to the fact that Blacks are not violent and perhaps view Blacks in a positive light. If however, as a Black I take pride in the stereotype that I am violent and seek my identity in that stereotype which has been trust on me by outsiders, perhaps I will only make that stereotype true. One can take pride in the fact that blogs are not considered trustworthy/significant or one can work actively, and try to overcome that stereotype. The choice as always is personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falcon</title>
		<link>http://punetech.com/why-you-should-attend-blogcamppune2/comment-page-1/#comment-6966</link>
		<dc:creator>Falcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punetech.com/?p=1418#comment-6966</guid>
		<description>@ All those blogs should be abt something serious

Firstly, I don&#039;t condemn those blogs but I am quite skeptical about trusting their content. They are a good place to develop interest in the topic get an overall view but certainly, I do not trust them blindly.

The reason being simple they are still an individual&#039;s opinion even though he may be in an expert his views need not be always true and the general opinion or belief. If he had been so sure of his/her opinion he might have put a research paper on it.

Blogs are informal and will always be informal. Content verification cannot be done in most cases and then again references are often to a third party blog, which translates as no verification.

Now, if personal blog is a waste of time both reader and the writer, by same logic sketching, dancing, gardening (only flowers), philately, playing chess, singing etc are a waste of time if u don&#039;t intend to do it professionally.

And FYI the most successful blogs (even if by a professional blogger) are not on a specific topic. If I talk abt say finance theory say, then do i expect a huge following when I speak on BSEL2 implementation impact in 2011 when a general visitor doesn&#039;t understand Securitization - apost written back say 2 yrs ago.

And Who says one needs 10000 visitors/readers. I am more than happy with my 10 and even happier if they were 5. Simply becoz I can express myself the way I can... My way ...And I say it becoz on my personal blog I hardly have 3 visitor a day and I like it that way!!! It gives me more freedom to curse, to abuse without even caring that my words may evoke a strong resentment in some..

But when I am on my team blog, I simply can&#039;t use harsh and strong words even though My heart really begs me to use it since the traffic is really high. And I want to ensure that I do not hurt someone or community unintentionally. And then there are people questioning ur every statement that means to give substantial proof.

take the Navin&#039;s case, an unintentional statement caused such a negative reaction that comments long enough to be a post in itself have been left by bloggers (and this includes yours truly!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ All those blogs should be abt something serious</p>
<p>Firstly, I don&#8217;t condemn those blogs but I am quite skeptical about trusting their content. They are a good place to develop interest in the topic get an overall view but certainly, I do not trust them blindly.</p>
<p>The reason being simple they are still an individual&#8217;s opinion even though he may be in an expert his views need not be always true and the general opinion or belief. If he had been so sure of his/her opinion he might have put a research paper on it.</p>
<p>Blogs are informal and will always be informal. Content verification cannot be done in most cases and then again references are often to a third party blog, which translates as no verification.</p>
<p>Now, if personal blog is a waste of time both reader and the writer, by same logic sketching, dancing, gardening (only flowers), philately, playing chess, singing etc are a waste of time if u don&#8217;t intend to do it professionally.</p>
<p>And FYI the most successful blogs (even if by a professional blogger) are not on a specific topic. If I talk abt say finance theory say, then do i expect a huge following when I speak on BSEL2 implementation impact in 2011 when a general visitor doesn&#8217;t understand Securitization &#8211; apost written back say 2 yrs ago.</p>
<p>And Who says one needs 10000 visitors/readers. I am more than happy with my 10 and even happier if they were 5. Simply becoz I can express myself the way I can&#8230; My way &#8230;And I say it becoz on my personal blog I hardly have 3 visitor a day and I like it that way!!! It gives me more freedom to curse, to abuse without even caring that my words may evoke a strong resentment in some..</p>
<p>But when I am on my team blog, I simply can&#8217;t use harsh and strong words even though My heart really begs me to use it since the traffic is really high. And I want to ensure that I do not hurt someone or community unintentionally. And then there are people questioning ur every statement that means to give substantial proof.</p>
<p>take the Navin&#8217;s case, an unintentional statement caused such a negative reaction that comments long enough to be a post in itself have been left by bloggers (and this includes yours truly!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
