For the past few weeks, every techie in Pune has probably had Google+ on his/her mind. Many have tried it. Some have dismissed is as a Facebook wannabe that will never really catch on. Others think it is a little too complicated for the common man.
However, three of Pune’s top tech bloggers have weighed in with positive opinions about Google+
Arun Prabhudesai of trak.in was first to say that Google+ will be adopted by Businesses and Brands:
After Google’s half baked and feeble attempts at Social Networking earlier, Google Plus is a refreshingly fresh & honest attempt at making people’s lives Social.
and
The biggest factor that Google Plus takes care of – Individual Privacy. It probably has simplest of privacy policies and user can control everything as to what is supposed to be public and what is not. Yes, initially users do have to spend time in creating circles (aka groups of people), but once you are done with that, it becomes far more easier.
and
Google Plus adoption for Brands & Businesses might be slow initially, but over a period of time, it will surely catch on. It will be a place where Brands can put up their profiles, their “+ses” and it will be accessible to anyone and everyone without having to actually “follow” the brand.
After that, Mahendra Palsule, the Skeptic Geek, and Editor at TechMeme, wrote to say that Facebook and Quora should be worried. His main points are this:
- The future belongs to the “Interest Graph” of users complementing the “Social Graph”. Facebook does a bad job of capturing users interests. Google+ is taking steps in the right direction with Sparks.
- Quora should be worried because:
> It was reported earlier […] that code for Questions has been found in Google Plus. If this comes as a surprise, you haven’t understood Google’s ambitions with Emerald Sea.
Finally, Dhananjay Nene was initially lukewarm about Google+ (“good, but people will not shift from facebook for this”, and “circles are too complicated for average users”) but after spending some time with Google+, he has decided that Google+ is the social network of the future:
[Google+] is really building public / private, asymmetric networking built using social graphs based on friendships, work relationships, online discoveries and probably soon enough interest graphs as well. It is building the network that will be. While google wants to own the experience, it is liberal enough to publicly commit that the data is owned by the user. Combined with the awesome google portfolio and its evergrowing warchest built out of search advertising revenues – This is the network to beat.
You really should read the full articles that I have linked above. In fact, you should follow these guys on twitter (@dnene, @ScepticGeek, and @trakin) and follow them religiously.
In that case, Google+ is bound to fail 🙂
Pune mastiff, http://www.google.com/+1/button/images/icon.png 😉
I think my comment was not approved.
But I would like to ask again:
With full respect to Dhananjay and the rest… I think its a little too much to call them the “top tech THINKERS of Pune”. Top tech bloggers is apt, but thinkers is a bit too much.
@Aditya, Would you be happier with “Top Tech Influencers”? I’m sure there are brilliant tech thinkers in Infosys and Persistent and Symantec and BMC, but it their thinking is not known to anybody but a handful of people within their company, it is not very useful. Yes, people like Anand Deshpande, Ganesh Natarajan are very influential, have achieved more, and are quite visible, but most of their pronouncements these days are about the business of tech rather than the tech of tech.
If you did some thinking and told nobody about it, did you really think?
Also, please note: this is the first time you’re submitting this comment on the site. Earlier, I think you made this comment on Google+. We do not censor comments even if we don’t agree with them. See our comment policy.